On 16/09/2009, at 7:40 AM, Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > Jody, > > Thank you for responding so quickly. I always appreciate your efforts > to answer my questions. Attempted collaboration with Geotools wouldn't > be the same without you. :]
I am losing patience with attempted collaboration - when open jump is interested in real collaboration I will be happy :-) > Based on the history that you posted, it sounds like OpenJUMP may have > made some shapefile fixes that you guys are missing. This would be the benefit of collaboration. > I think most of > our fixes had to do with the way polygon rings are handled. I will > have to search our mailing list and ask around to see if I can get a > list of the fixes we implemented. Who would I talk to about seeing if > these fixes are needed in the Geotools shapefile code, and on getting > them contributed if they are needed? I just hit the high points (ie development efforts that lasted over a month); for bug fixes JIRA is the best record. - http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/BrowseComponent.jspa?id=10270&componentId=10540&subset=-1 Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
