Hey Andrea This change sounds great, and porting back to 2.6.x sounds good too. Over here, we do use SVG in some of our projects, but I didn't quite understand it when you said that you would "break upgrades" for those who use it.. What do you mean?
Milton Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > today I've split the SVG symbols factory into its own plugin/svg > module making the renderer module a lot lighter for those that do > not need to use SVG and thus Batik. > > The modification was done on trunk only. The new module does not > really bring any new functionality and has both 100% > line and branch test coverage (ok, easy peasy, it's just two classes...) > > Two questions: > - shall I backport the split to 2.6.x as well? I would break upgrades > for those that are actually using SVG > - the module name is probably not great, graphics-svg might be better, > but for consistency I would have to use graphics-charts for the > Eastwood chart based module > > Cheers > Andrea > -- Milton Jonathan Grupo GIS e Meio Ambiente Tecgraf/PUC-Rio Tel: +55-21-3527-2502 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
