Martin Davis ha scritto: > Andrea, > > All the issues you raise are reasonable. At this point I don't think > Proj4J is anywhere near ready for the level of production use that you > need in GeoTools. > > Unit testing is definitely a focus with Proj4J, but it's going to take a > while to build up a wide body of tests. My hope is over time to borrow > tests from other libraries and add them to Proj4J. If the tests were > available in MetaCRS format this would be easier... 8^) > > Also, as you point out the only CRS description language currently > supported is PROJ.4 (and that only partially at the moment). Perhaps in > time this will expand, but it's a laborious task (especially testing).
Right. My hope is to start leveraging the projection code wrapping it so that it works by GeoTools rules. The investment on datum, parameter aliases for WKT, EPSG factories, axis order handling in GeoTools is massive, I would not consider replacing it with something else at the moment. But the projections, once tested enough, will surely provide enough benefit to compensate for the migration work Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
