That metaCRS project is all about these projects having shared testing expectations ... not sure how successful that is but that was the goal of the meta projection.
So I would hope that martin is checking the results against the other projects. Jody On 03/02/2010, at 9:23 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Same martin as from JTS >> - http://lin-ear-th-inking.blogspot.com/2010/01/announcing-proj4j.html > > Interesting indeed. I think it would be nice to leverage that library > for projection code support, as it provides support for more projections > that we already do. > > I'm however worried by the lack of unit testing. GeoTools projections > are each covered by one or more tests that assesses the projection > correctness against projected values obtained by using either ArcGis > or libproj (cs2cs in particular). > That makes the projections trustworthy. > > In order to switch gt2 to proj4j (only for projections) we'd have > to do quite a bit of work in terms of integration on our side (as > we'd have to keep all the work on datum/parameter/projection name > aliases to still read ESRI wkt) and to be confident we'd also have > to provide testing work. Ugh. > > Long story short, I definitely have interest, but the undertaking > to start leveraging their work would be quite substantial... > > Cheers > Andrea > > -- > Andrea Aime > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
