On 12/05/10 14:21, Andrea Aime wrote: > Yeah, sorry. For this specific case I knew the app-schema crew did not > have any stake in 1.7.x/2.5.x (afaik you jumped straight from a 1.6.x > branch to 2.0.x, correct?) so I just went ahead
Yes, you are quite right: app-schema jumped from 1.6.x/2.4.x straight to trunk, and never backported to 1.7.x/2.5.x. There were a few people in my group using 1.7.x for non-app-schema development, including coverage stuff, but they are all migrated or exiled. I fully support the action you took. It is not a problem. I was just slightly amused to see both the request for feedback and the corresponding action between dinner and breakfast, and I wondered "what if it was something I didn't want?" More of a cautionary learning than a complaint. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
