Jody Garnett ha scritto: > I view this as one of the "stars" we use to evaluate things (ie > things we care about as a community) rather then a complete down > check. The fact that the coverage is being checked with a nightly > build somewhere means that any incidental breakage will be found out > quickly right?
Coverage being checked nightly? This is news to me. > We do not demand all the points raised be covered in order to > graduate; but we do want to know what we are up against with respect > to plugin documentation, test coverage, ip check etc. I think ip > check is the only formal one that can issue a down check. Correct. However I believe we should resist any module graduation that does not have enough tests unless there is good reason for that. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
