> Correct, the *plan* does not account for a pure memory feature collection. > Although could this could possibly just be a ContentFeatureCollection wrapped > around a FeatureStore from a MemoryDataStore?
ContentDataStore is in the data module; I need this in main. So I stole the interesting parts of the design. The MemoryDataStore is terrible and uses a TreeSet, I am experimenting with a List, and SpatialIndex as alternatives. But yes that idea is exactly what I am doing. > Regardless, another implementation could be a pure in memory implementation, > no store backing would be fine imo as long as it's explicit it is not backed > by any sort of datastore. I thought we already had one of these in one of our > 20 odd FC implementations... perhaps not. See above; nothing actually good for being light or fast. Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
