Hi Justin, > My main question is from what branch should the site be generated? Trunk > or the latest stable branch?
The sphinx docs (examples) on trunk are the only ones that have been getting attention. Confusingly, they refer to the 2.6.x code (links in the docs are to tags/2.6.4). This is my fault I'm afraid - it was a hack to appease folk on the user list. As a result, what would be nice is to have the sphinx docs on trunk copied to the 2.6.x branch. Then I can unhook the trunk versions from 2.6 and edit them for the new 2.7 API. > For the website itself it would make sense just to generate it from the > trunk. However for hte user guide I guess it would make more sense to > publish multiple copies of it, one for trunk, one for the stable branch, > similar to how geoserver does it. Yes - that would be ideal. > One problem with only generating the site from trunk is that the site > currently includes the examples. It would make sense to have examples > for both the stable branch and the trunk. Definitely. > So to remedy this how do people feel about the following: > > a. Move the examples from the site into the userguide > > b. Create docs.geotools.org that contains two links: > > 1. a link to the stable userguide > 2. a link to the trunk userguide > > c. Update the site to website to link to docs.geotools.org, or maybe > just directly to the stable documentation. > > Thoughts? Sounds groovy :) Thanks for all this work. Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
