It could of been either of us; if it is possible it would allow people to work 
with massive grids without wasting memory.

However that is a change you could do behind the scenes - as as long as people 
only ever get a FeaureCollection from you they won't have to care how you 
implement iterator() 

-- 
Jody Garnett

On Sunday, 17 April 2011 at 10:55 AM, Michael Bedward wrote: 
> Cool ! Looking at the docs now.
> 
> Yes, it would be great to promote it and merging it into gt-data
> sounds like a good idea. I think you and/or Andrea had suggested it
> would be better if re-written to stream features on demand rather than
> create them up front. Do you remember ?
> 
> Michael
> 
> On 16 April 2011 23:07, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Grid doc is up for your review Michael:
> > - http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/unsupported/grid.html
> > It looks good; are you ever considering moving this to supported? Would it
> > come in as its own module; or as extra couple of classes for gt-data (as it
> > concerns data generation).
> > 
> > --
> > Jody Garnett
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to