I'd also like to change this procedure to read: "-1: Against - required to provide a reason"
Any nobody can argue with my proposal unless they have an alternative alternative [sic], as per the current policy. :-) On 29/04/11 19:34, Andrea Aime wrote: > Per our procedures everyone voting -1 has to provide an alternative, just > saying > "no" is not allowed: > http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/procedures/proposal.html#voting -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
