Bleck;
It is too bad that EPSG:0 is not working out; as that would require very little
understanding when people are trying to figure out what went wrong.
As long as we are going for leet suggest we take a "a range" for geotools
specific stuff; ie "gt=->47"
My own suggestion would be "404" for page not found; resulting in 470404.
Jody
--
Jody Garnett
On Monday, 2 May 2011 at 11:19 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> I object: I proposed that you use a custom EPSG code >32767, as
> recommended by EPSG. Please refer to my email, included below.
>
> On 29/04/11 19:34, Andrea Aime wrote:
> > I see that both Ben and Christian voted it down though... with an
> > invalid vote btw.
> > Per our procedures everyone voting -1 has to provide an alternative, just
> > saying
> > "no" is not allowed:
> > http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/procedures/proposal.html#voting
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [ExternalEmail] Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding support for a new
> EPSG code: EPSG:0
> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:48:15 +0800
> From: Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
> To: Andrea Aime <[email protected]>
> CC: Geotools-Devel list <[email protected]>
>
> -1 from me, because EPSG:0 is already reserved by the EPSG OGP Geodesy
> Subcommittee. Would you consider another integer >32767? Think of other
> extensions, like 900913. What is l33t for c4rt3514n (still missing a few
> digits)?
>
> Furthermore, if we were to accept EPSG:0, would GeoServer start
> advertising it in its Capabilities?
>
> Kind regards,
> Ben.
>
>
> http://www.epsg.org/CurrentDB.html
>
> ******
>
> EPSG Codes
>
> The OGP Geodesy Subcommittee has reserved the integer range 0 to 32767
> for use as codes. As of dataset version 6.3, the integer range from
> 6,000,000 to 6,999,999 was also reserved for codes for geographic CRSs
> in explicitly described degree representations, but this is no longer
> supported. To prevent conflict with future additions to the EPSG
> dataset, users who wish to augment the data with their own information
> should utilise codes greater than 32768.
>
> If users wish to supplement the change table with their own entries, it
> is important that the user's change notice IDs be above the EPSG integer
> code limit of 32,767.0. Such an entry in the change table is required
> for users to deprecate any erroneous user data.
>
> ******
>
>
>
> --
> Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
> Software Engineering Team Leader
> CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
> Australian Resources Research Centre
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
> The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
> management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
> acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
