When he says we it is more that he hurt my mind talking about byte code and
I ran and hid in a corner. I actually think it is really and interesting
idea; but would love to see some benchmarking to justify the complexity /
effort / magic.
Jody
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Michael Bedward
<[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi again Andrea,
>
> Jody and I chatted on IRC a while ago about how using these functions
> with rasters and how bad this would be :) We were talking in
> particular about InterpolateFunction and wondered about compiling the
> interpolation expression to bytecode using Janino. What do you think ?
>
> Michael
>
>
> On 5 July 2011 13:31, Michael Bedward <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 4 July 2011 20:26, Andrea Aime <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I looked into the SE spec for RasterSymbolizer, it uses the Categorize
> >> function
> >> and the Interpolate one, not the Recode one.
> >
> > Section 11.6.4 of the specs
> > (05-077_Symbology_Encoding_Implementation_Specification.pdf) includes
> > Recode along with Interpolate and Categorize - unless I'm looking at
> > the wrong doc ?
> >
> > Michael
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
