On Friday, 21 September 2012 at 12:43 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hmmm... i don't know but it seems pretty clear to me that we simply list out
> the original bug reports, meaning they were fixed release. There is also
> overhead here to consider. With the above list we can simply copy and past, i
> don't really want to spend an hour rewriting every ticket description.
>
Fair enough, I would settle for a few of the more interesting ones (as Andrea
pointed out highlighting the work of new volunteers). And then an invitation to
read the release notes for more details.
> > How about …
> >
> > Thanks to community members for the following github pull requests:
> >
> > * Thanks to mbenowit for fixing ContourProcess
> > * Davide Savazzi for fixing ContentFeatureCollection isEmpty method, and
> > the logging cascaded WMS queries
> > * Tim Schaub for improving exception messages
> > * Victor Olaya for reviewing function parameter names
> > * Peter hopfgartner for setting up Reprojecting feature collection to use a
> > wider range of transforms
>
> Yeah, again imo i don't want to spend a day just on the announcement. Thanks
> for putting this together though, wil update my version. Also the first one
> in this list i don't believe was every merged directly.
>
For bug fix releases I do not think we need to do much; for normal releases
that have a new feature or two it will be easier to write (hopefully a blog
post link).
Cheers,
Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
