Hey Mauricio!

Thanks for the response. Some comments inline.

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Mauricio Pazos <[email protected]>wrote:

> **
>
> On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 09:01:52 PM Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
>
> >
>
> > Unless i am mistaken it is not currently possible to create a simple
> equals
>
> > filter that involves a date literal? Quite simply what I would like to do
>
> > is be able to parse a filter like:
>
> >
>
> >   foo = 2006-12-31T01:30:00Z
>
> Right, the valid predicated are
>
> <temporal predicate> ::=
>
>     <attribute_name> "BEFORE" <date-time expression>
>
>   | <attribute_name> "BEFORE OR DURING" <period>
>
>   | <attribute_name> "DURING" <period>
>
>   | <attribute_name> "DURING OR AFTER" <period>
>
>   | <attribute_name> "AFTER" <date-time expression>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> > I tried expressing this filter with the existing temporal predicates but
>
> > couldn't figure out a way to do it.
>
>
>
> Did you try DURING? something like:
>
>
>
> foo DURING 2006-12-31T01:30:00Z/2006-12-31T01:30:00Z
>

I did try this. Unfortunately it doesn't work with an "empty" interval. BUt
if you make the duration a second it works. And while for a lot of cases i
imagine that would suffice but it seems kind of a nasty hack.

>
>
> >
>
> > Is there any reason not to support date literals in the existing non
>
> > temporal predicates?
>
>
>
> Well, in the OGC specification the syntax is
>
> <date-time expression ::= <date-time> | <period>
>
> <full_date> ::= <date-year> "-" <date-month> "-" <date-day>
>
> <date-year> ::= <digit><digit><digit><digit>
>
> <date-month> ::= <digit><digit>
>
> <date-day> ::= <digit><digit>
>
>
>
> I think we could add a new predicate
>
>
>
> ::= <attribute_name> EQUAL <date-time expression>
>
>
>
> To CQL
>

Cool. So you prefer using the "EQUAL" term as opposed to normal "=". In the
patch i threw together the idea was to make a date/datetime expression a
valid literal, and it seems to work ok. The nice thing about this approach
is that it works with all the simple comparison operators.


>
>
> >
>
> > Anyways, I took a crack at a patch for this:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
> https://github.com/jdeolive/geotools/commit/70bfc8819fc8751382f9e75f4ecd293f
>
> > eec0c280
>
> >
>
> > But fully admin i am not very familiar with the CQL module so my approach
>
> > might be way off.
>
> OK, I will have a look this week
>
> >
>
> > -Justin
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mauricio Pazos
>



-- 
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to