Just a quick query. Where is this information recorded? Who signed which agreement and when. I haven't seen it in the code base (I could be wrong). Are there other sources of administrative documents? Are these restricted to the PMC? I understand if this is so.
Or have I muddied the waters even further? -----Original Message----- From: Ben Caradoc-Davies [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, 17 June 2013 1:24 PM To: Andrea Aime Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] Updated contributor guide to reflect small-patch policy On 14/06/13 16:28, Andrea Aime wrote: > What worries me is that we demand a test to be added for each > contribution, so people will be hard pressed to find an existing class > to use in order to contribute the fix without having to add a file. > Maybe we can be gentle and add a empty test class for them to work in > :-p There are heaps of test classes. Anyone needing a new one can sign a contributor agreement. The new process is easy. An even easier one would be a form in which a contributor fills in the blanks and sends a plain text email to osgeo and themself. Timestamps and recorded IP addresses should be sufficient, but then I am not a lawyer. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineer CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
