I had concerns also.
While not nuclear bomb-like, backwards compatibility came to mind.
Brett
From: Andrea Aime [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 June 2013 4:16 PM
To: Geotools-Devel list
Subject: [Geotools-devel] About PR 217, H2 upgrad
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/217
Peter thinks this one is fine, I look at it and see a nuclear bomb ready to
explode.
In order to upgrade this one we also have to upgrade the dependencies in
GeoServer and GWC and make sure the upgrade path is smooth (the database format
changed a few times and it's the reason why we haven't upgraded so far).
Not against it, but who's going to put the work to do all the tests and
eventually perform code changes that might be required for a smooth transition?
I can already tell you it's not going to be automatic unless some code is
written:
http://www.oecd-nea.org/janis/help/upgrade_database_to_3.2.html
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
