On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]>wrote:
> A little confused here... are we talking h2 or hsql? The pr doesn't seem
> to touch h2 at all unless i am missing something.
>
Doh, you're right, it's HSQL!
>
> Regardless i agree that any upgrade requiring a migration like this we
> need to be careful of. I would say keep pegged to a version we know is safe
> but also try to allow for users to manually upgrade if they want to.
>
Right. HSQL is only used for the EPSG database as far as I know, this makes
things easier as by changing the version
number of the epsg database the old db won't even be considered.
That said, some tests need to be done to ensure multiple apps can still
share the db once created (e.g., does HSQLdb 2.0
respect the read only flags like 1.0 did?).
Otherwise the queries are pretty simple, don't really expect failures from
that front.
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
