Got one failure in:
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.395 sec
<<< FAILURE! - in
org.geotools.gce.imagemosaic.processing.ArtifactsFilterTest
testArtifact(org.geotools.gce.imagemosaic.processing.ArtifactsFilterTest)
Time elapsed: 0.323 sec <<< ERROR!
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError: null
at org.geotools.util.logging.Logging.<clinit>(Logging.java:115)
at
org.geotools.image.palette.ColorIndexerDescriptor.<clinit>(ColorIndexerDescriptor.java:43)
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:270)
at
javax.media.jai.RegistryFileParser.getInstance(RegistryFileParser.java:227)
at
javax.media.jai.RegistryFileParser.registerDescriptor(RegistryFileParser.java:352)
at javax.media.jai.RegistryFileParser.parseFile(RegistryFileParser.java:287)
at
javax.media.jai.RegistryFileParser.loadOperationRegistry(RegistryFileParser.java:57)
at
javax.media.jai.OperationRegistry.registerServices(OperationRegistry.java:2033)
at
javax.media.jai.ThreadSafeOperationRegistry.registerServices(ThreadSafeOperationRegistry.java:612)
at
javax.media.jai.OperationRegistry.initializeRegistry(OperationRegistry.java:365)
at javax.media.jai.JAI.<clinit>(JAI.java:560)
at
org.geotools.gce.imagemosaic.processing.ArtifactsFilterTest.setup(ArtifactsFilterTest.java:37)
This is due to JAI.getDefaultInstance() returning null? Simple enough to
check for, but not sure what this test is doing to JAI :)
Jody Garnett
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]>wrote:
> Briefly GeoTools.init() was going to register an ImagingListener. The
>>> rejected pull request added GeoTools.init() to each test case @Before
>>> method.
>>>
>>
>> Mind, I did not mean to reject the pull request, just wanted to express
>> concern on its (lack of) future maintability
>>
>
> Based on your feedback I am happy to reject the pull request. I actually
> had both ideas yesterday and took the least short-term risk in order to try
> out the change and confirm it does not have undue side effects.
>
> In todays meeting we hit on another approach. In the static init of our
>>> logging class I will check if JAI has an ImagingListener, and if it is null
>>> I will add in our own.
>>>
>>
>> Right. Anyone knows if that might present issues we haven't considered?
>>
>
> I think it will be fine, I was more concerned that introducing
> GeoServer.int() everywhere would slow down tests - as it plays some silly
> games to try and connect to first commons logging and then log4j before
> defaulting to Java logging.
> --
> Jody
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
