Hey folks,

I have been lurking watching Geoserver like a fond grandparent now for a
long time, and now perhaps going to be in a position to use it in anger
again, so started playing with the latest release.

I just wanted to say how fabulous it is looking, (visually, technically and
support wise) and how impressed I have been with the ongoing energy,
commitment, and especially community-minded teamwork you guys have managed
to sustain.

+1 million.

Rob Atkinson

On 19 March 2015 at 08:08, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:

> Managed to review, had a couple questions about ResourceInfo.getName()
> API. I am on IRC if you want to quickly blast through this...
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 18 March 2015 at 13:47, Niels Charlier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Yeah definitely.
>>
>>
>> On 18-03-15 20:04, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Niels/Sampo - I had an action item to review the changes but did
>> not get to it.
>>
>>  I assume this change is of benefit to geoserver wfs cascade (and would
>> like to be included in the release?)
>>
>>    --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>> On 18 March 2015 at 08:18, Niels Charlier <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hello Sampo,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your review and your comments, I have responded to them.
>>>
>>> I hope we can push this commit through asap.
>>>
>>> Kind Regards
>>> Niels
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13-03-15 15:01, Sampo Savolainen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>  Sorry about the radio silence. I've been working on an unrelated big
>>> project and I haven't had a chance to focus on this. I agree that the
>>> testing in wfs-ng has not been up to spec and I appreciate your effort in
>>> getting that house in order. I had a quick look and found nothing really
>>> wrong with it but I didn't have a chance to actually try it out. Comments
>>> are in github.
>>>
>>>  Which version would this be included in? 13.1?
>>>
>>>
>>>   Sampo
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Niels Charlier <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sampo,
>>>>
>>>> Would you have the time to have a look at that? Or anyone else?
>>>>
>>>> Kind Regards
>>>> Niels
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28-02-15 19:16, Niels Charlier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a new patch ready to improve the wfs-ng tests. All of this was
>>>>> done with the purpose of creating test cases for the new WFS 2.0
>>>>> functionality.
>>>>> I thought the test directory in wfs-ng was such a terrible mess it
>>>>> needed serious work first.
>>>>> A summary of what happened in this commit:
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. Removed a bunch of duplicated test support reference data xml
>>>>> files,
>>>>>       and put all of them in one single directory structure instead of
>>>>> being spread around.
>>>>>    2. WFFTestData and DataTestSupport were almost duplicates from each
>>>>> other,
>>>>>       removed the older one and converted all tests to use the newer
>>>>> one.
>>>>>    3. There were two separate geoserveronlinetests, one for wfs1.0 and
>>>>> one for both wfs1.0 and wfs1.1
>>>>>        made one abstract online test class and one derived test class
>>>>> per
>>>>> server/version combination.
>>>>>    4. Enabled all of the disabled online test methods and made them
>>>>> work
>>>>> with the geoserver tests (release data dir).
>>>>>    5. Enabled most of the disabled test methods in the integration test
>>>>> and made them work for the wfs1.1 geoserver
>>>>>       integration test case.
>>>>>    6. Fixed issues with axis order implementation so the offline and
>>>>> online axis order tests work.
>>>>>    7. Created a very clear package/directory structure for all tests so
>>>>> that you can very easily see
>>>>>       which server/wfs-version combinations have tests and which don't,
>>>>> offline and online.
>>>>>    8. Renamed some confusing class names and removed unnecessary
>>>>> duplicated stuff
>>>>>       for example there was both a TestHttpClient and TestHTTPClient.
>>>>>    9. Added pullparser test which tests the new parser (that works with
>>>>> GML3.2).
>>>>>
>>>>> TODO
>>>>>    1. make online and offline WFS 2.0 tests. THis should now be rather
>>>>> easy with the existing abstract integration and online
>>>>>       test classes available which only require you to insert the right
>>>>> reference data info.
>>>>>    2. verify the existing online tests for other servers than geoserver
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/757
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Niels
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
>>>>> sponsored
>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub
>>>>> for all
>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership
>>>>> blogs to
>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join
>>>>> the
>>>>> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>>  Sampo Savolainen
>>> R&D Director, Spatineo Oy
>>> [email protected]
>>> +358-407555649
>>> Linnankoskenkatu 16 A 17, 00250 Helsinki, Finland
>>> www.spatineo.com, twitter.com/#!/spatineo
>>> <http://twitter.com/#%21/spatineo>
>>> www.linkedin.com/company/spatineo-inc
>>>
>>>  This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information.
>>> If you
>>> have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you
>>> may not use, copy, disseminate, or distribute it; do not open any
>>> attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender
>>> promptly by e-mail that you have done so.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
>>> sponsored
>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub
>>> for all
>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership
>>> blogs to
>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
>>> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored
> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for
> all
> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs
> to
> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to