Make sense to me! IMO we should not care to much about workflows in other projects. And I agree, we should remove the states you mentioned.
Is it correct that the backup is outstanding? I'm still wondering why Adminstrators cannot change a state independenly from the defined workflow. However, looking forward to see the simple workflow life -- Frank 2015-11-13 22:31 GMT+01:00 Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>: > On 14/11/15 09:26, Frank Gasdorf wrote: > >> At the moment of writing there are two issues with "SUBMITTED" state. I'd >> like to set both to resolved. If I understood you correctly although you >> are Admin's in JIRA its not possible to change the state. Is it possible >> to >> remove the State in general from workflow? Otherwise I'd contact Atlasian >> team afterwards. Could you please try this procedure? >> > > Frank, please see the thread "Jira workflow problem" in which I propose > changing the workflow and whether we first need a backup of the issue > database. I have created a new workflow, but I have not yet received all > the responses I want. I will be raising this issue again at this week's > committee meeting. I would be quite happy to remove the Submitted, > Iteration, and Analysis states, but I want to discuss first so our workflow > is compatible with uDig. > > > Kind regards, > > -- > Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> > Director > Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/> > New Zealand >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
