Thanks Simone, answers inline.
> Got a question about that, when the granules overlap we make use of the
> > attribute based sort order. Does that sample all overlapping granules in
> a
> > location - or can we think of a way to limit what is sampled based on
> sort
> > order.
>
> I am not sure I understand this, can you clarify?
>
Andrea has the right words with "excess granule removal". The use-case is
having lots of different DEM data for a region, and allowing the layer to
be configured with different sort orders (to capture priority like
resolution, or how current a dataset is).
I know the danger of premature optimization, but I expect many overlapping
granules (capturing elevation data with different times, resolutions,
accuracy).
Rethinking about my initial suggestion, things might become complex if you
> want to have also transitions at the borders.
>
I assume you mean transitions at the border between granules? I guess you
could try for a feathering effect if people wanted a smooth transition -
out of scope for now :)
I would suggest you share some more information about what you are trying
> to do so that we are a better picture before suggesting more.
Understood, we should be able to stage public sample data in the
unsupported/dem module.
>
>
> > --
> > Jody
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
