We have been working today and have made the following proposal:
- https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Migrate-Units-to-JSR-363

So far no surprises, we will be in tomorrows GeoTools meeting if there are
any questions, and would like to proceed with a pull request this week.

--
Jody Garnett

On 7 March 2018 at 10:28, César Martínez Izquierdo <cesar....@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Andrea and Jody for your very kind offers.
>
> I will be at the Bonn code sprint. I've committed to work on some
> other tasks, but I think I could keep some time (maybe a day?) for
> pushing this task.
> In any case, I'll try to advance some work before the code sprint.
>
> I think I will start by updating the proposal you linked and trying to
> figure out how to use unit-ri/unit-se (JSR 363 implementations).
> Any suggestion is welcome.
>
> Regards,
>
> César
>
>
> On 7 March 2018 at 08:41, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I saw the activity on jira and found the “withdrawn” proposal -
> > https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Replace-JSR-275-Units-Library
> >
> > If we can update this with a plan I would be pleased to work on this
> during
> > the OSGeo code sprint.
> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:21 AM Jens Auer <jens.a...@betaversion.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have to admit that I sent the mails last year and wanted to work on
> >> migrating to jsr363. However, when I quickly ran into problems when I
> wanted
> >> to use jsr363 in our project in a limited way just in our own classes.
> We
> >> have multiple dependencies that depend on JScience /jsr275, and using
> both
> >> jsr363 and jsr275 in a project leads to many problems because both use
> the
> >> javax.measure package and some identical class names. I guess it would
> have
> >> been easier if jsr363 used another package, but because of these issues
> I
> >> stopped working on the migration.
> >>
> >> Best wishes,
> >> Jens
> >>
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: César Martínez Izquierdo <cesar....@gmail.com>
> >> Gesendet: Freitag, 2. März 2018 11:28
> >> An: geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> Cc: jens.a...@betaversion.net; Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
> >> Betreff: Replace JScience JSR275 with JSR363
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> Last year there was a thread on the list regarding the migration from
> >> JScience/JSR275 to JSR363, although I assume that no progress was
> finally
> >> achieved:
> >>
> >>
> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/geotools-devel@lists.
> sourceforge.net/msg38174.html
> >>
> >> I'd like to help on this effort, if there is still interest in migrating
> >> to JSR363.
> >>
> >> The use of JSR275 is a problem since there are collisions on
> >> package/classes/method signatures between JSR363 and JSR363, so you
> can't
> >> combine Geotools with any library using JS363.
> >>
> >> Note that JSR275 is used by the "forked" GeoAPI APIs used in Geotools,
> so
> >> this change will imply some method signature modifications on that API.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> César Martínez
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >>    César Martínez Izquierdo
> >>    GIS developer
> >>    -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
> >>    SCOLAB: http://www.scolab.es
> >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft.
> >> http://www.avg.com
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > --
> > Jody Garnett
>
>
>
> --
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>    César Martínez Izquierdo
>    GIS developer
>    -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
>    SCOLAB: http://www.scolab.es
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to