Hi Jody,
looks good, will you also have corresponding GWC/GS pull requests (if at
all needed, of course)?

Cheers
Andrea

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> We have been working today and have made the following proposal:
> - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Migrate-Units-to-JSR-363
>
> So far no surprises, we will be in tomorrows GeoTools meeting if there are
> any questions, and would like to proceed with a pull request this week.
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 7 March 2018 at 10:28, César Martínez Izquierdo <cesar....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Andrea and Jody for your very kind offers.
>>
>> I will be at the Bonn code sprint. I've committed to work on some
>> other tasks, but I think I could keep some time (maybe a day?) for
>> pushing this task.
>> In any case, I'll try to advance some work before the code sprint.
>>
>> I think I will start by updating the proposal you linked and trying to
>> figure out how to use unit-ri/unit-se (JSR 363 implementations).
>> Any suggestion is welcome.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> César
>>
>>
>> On 7 March 2018 at 08:41, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I saw the activity on jira and found the “withdrawn” proposal -
>> > https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Replace-JSR-275-Units-Library
>> >
>> > If we can update this with a plan I would be pleased to work on this
>> during
>> > the OSGeo code sprint.
>> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:21 AM Jens Auer <jens.a...@betaversion.net>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I have to admit that I sent the mails last year and wanted to work on
>> >> migrating to jsr363. However, when I quickly ran into problems when I
>> wanted
>> >> to use jsr363 in our project in a limited way just in our own classes.
>> We
>> >> have multiple dependencies that depend on JScience /jsr275, and using
>> both
>> >> jsr363 and jsr275 in a project leads to many problems because both use
>> the
>> >> javax.measure package and some identical class names. I guess it would
>> have
>> >> been easier if jsr363 used another package, but because of these
>> issues I
>> >> stopped working on the migration.
>> >>
>> >> Best wishes,
>> >> Jens
>> >>
>> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> >> Von: César Martínez Izquierdo <cesar....@gmail.com>
>> >> Gesendet: Freitag, 2. März 2018 11:28
>> >> An: geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> Cc: jens.a...@betaversion.net; Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
>> >> Betreff: Replace JScience JSR275 with JSR363
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >> Last year there was a thread on the list regarding the migration from
>> >> JScience/JSR275 to JSR363, although I assume that no progress was
>> finally
>> >> achieved:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/geotools-devel@lists.sourceforg
>> e.net/msg38174.html
>> >>
>> >> I'd like to help on this effort, if there is still interest in
>> migrating
>> >> to JSR363.
>> >>
>> >> The use of JSR275 is a problem since there are collisions on
>> >> package/classes/method signatures between JSR363 and JSR363, so you
>> can't
>> >> combine Geotools with any library using JS363.
>> >>
>> >> Note that JSR275 is used by the "forked" GeoAPI APIs used in Geotools,
>> so
>> >> this change will imply some method signature modifications on that API.
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >>
>> >> César Martínez
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> >>    César Martínez Izquierdo
>> >>    GIS developer
>> >>    -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
>> >>    SCOLAB: http://www.scolab.es
>> >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> >>
>> >> ---
>> >> Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG auf Viren geprüft.
>> >> http://www.avg.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> > --
>> > --
>> > Jody Garnett
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>    César Martínez Izquierdo
>>    GIS developer
>>    -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
>>    SCOLAB: http://www.scolab.es
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Andrea Aime

==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V
for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.

The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to