I outlined the proposal here https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/HTTPClient-Factory
I will ask for a review in tomorrow's meeting and trust we can get this done ahead of the next release. -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 at 16:15, Roar Brænden <roar.brenden...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm aware that you have a way of doing things, and that my approach wasn't > in accordance with that. The history is that I worked with gt-tile-client > this autumn and tried to make it work in parallel while fetching tiles. > While looking at this I saw that all too many classes of Geotools take > HTTPClient as an argument for the constructor, rather than using a factory > pattern. And that's strange cause elsewhere you are using factory patterns > a lot. > > > > 23. des. 2020 kl. 23:46 skrev Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>: > > > > Roar: > > > > As you may have noticed in the meeting notes your HTTPClient ideas were > discussed. As it has grown in the telling I agreed to write this up as a > proposal for the community (it is how we do design documents and make sure > everyone is in agreement on "big" or "impactful" changes. > > > > Before I get going what is your feeling between "gt-http" and "gt-web"? > > -- > > > I would prefer to use http, as web is too wide. > For the moment I have these two projects in the file structure: > > library / http (gt-http) > plugin / http-commons (gt-http-commons) > > > Regards > > Roar Brænden
_______________________________________________ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
