Hi Mark,
I agree with the sentiment in general, that code has been left there
rotting, making it more visible
might spur some interest in it.
However there lies the issue... it's getting moved from a module that's
officially unsupported, to
one that is, and while it's still incomplete in functionality.

I think we first need to sort out the maintenance of it. If Matthijs Laan
wants to be the maintainer of
it, then it can be moved, otherwise it makes little sense to do so. And if
he does, he should speak
to what level he intends to do so. If he's gonna bring it functionally on
par with the rest of GML
parsers, then it can belong to gt-xml, otherwise it's probably best if it
stays in unsupported, in its own module.

Just my 2 cents...

Cheers
Andrea

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 2:33 PM Mark Prins <mc.pr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 06-05-2021 10:55, Matthijs Laan via GeoTools-Devel wrote:
> >
> > The internal StAX GML parser from the wfs-ng module would be useful as a
> > public API as it is much simpler and faster than the GTXML parsers,
> > although the latter supports more GML elements.
> >
> > Beside the GTXML parsers there is also a SAX GML parser in gt-xml,
> > package org.geotools.gml.
> >
> > Would it be a good idea to move the XmlSimpleFeatureParser.parseGeom()
> > method to the gt-xml module in a package like org.geotools.gml.stream,
> > or better to create a new module like modules/unsupported/gml-streaming?
> >
> > Moving it to gt-xml would mean no dependencies would change for wfs-ng.
> > On the other hand gt-xml also contains a SAX based SLD parser but a StAX
> > SLD parser is in a separate ysld module.
> >
> > In addition to making it a public API, it is also a good opportunity to
> > reduce code duplication in XmlSimpleFeatureParser and
> > XmlComplexFeatureParser. The latter descends from XmlFeatureParser which
> > has duplicated parseGeom() methods which have already diverged because
> > in GEOT-6835 / #3393 MultiCurve support was added to one but not the
> > other. Some more GML support for Arcs etc. could also be added.
> >
> > Either way is a simple tasks moving some code around, I can make a PR
> > for it.
> >
>
> +1 for pulling it up into gt-xml
> -M
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>


-- 

Regards, Andrea Aime

== GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf
Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa
(LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
------------------------------------------------------- *Con riferimento
alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 -
Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni
circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali
allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i
destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per
errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le
sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679
“GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information
herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by
telephone or e-mail.*
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to