I could not get the the upgrade to work on wondows either for
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3474
I'm suspecting something with last modified time of those files.
the path to the file is insignificant; it is a random temp directory
generated by junit
Op 01-07-2021 om 18:18 schreef Ian Turton:
I'm trying to bump the version of commons-io from 2.6 to 2.10 (or any
other value for now) and all is fine except for
`org.geotools.coverage.io.netcdf.NetCDFMosaicReaderTest.testReHarvest()`
on a Windows machine which fails by not reading the 2 new granules
added to the NC file. I've checked the obvious things like files being
held open or not overwritten etc and it isn't anything obvious that I
can see (I'm sure it will be obvious once someone points it out :-) ).
I've compared the log files of a linux and windows run but nothing
jumps out at me.
16c16
< INFO: ACCEPTED:
/tmp/junit8062632297122653609/nc_harvest4/polyphemus_20130301_test.nc
<http://polyphemus_20130301_test.nc>
---
> INFO: ACCEPTED:
C:\Users\ian\AppData\Local\Temp\junit17289880738954782938\nc_harvest4\polyphemus_20130301_test.nc
<http://polyphemus_20130301_test.nc>
24c24
< INFO: found
/tmp/junit8062632297122653609/nc_harvest4/datastore.properties
---
> INFO: found
C:\Users\ian\AppData\Local\Temp\junit17289880738954782938\nc_harvest4\datastore.properties
the file names are different!
36a37,38
> org.geotools.gce.imagemosaic.Utils loadMosaicProperties
> INFO: Required key Levels not found.
Windows seems to loop through this one more time (I suspect it is just
a timing thing as my windows VM is slower)
38c40
< INFO: found
/tmp/junit8062632297122653609/nc_harvest4/datastore.properties
---
> INFO: found
C:\Users\ian\AppData\Local\Temp\junit17289880738954782938\nc_harvest4\datastore.properties
45c47
< target
/tmp/junit8062632297122653609/nc_harvest4/polyphemus_20130301_test.nc
<http://polyphemus_20130301_test.nc>
---
> target
C:\Users\ian\AppData\Local\Temp\junit17289880738954782938\nc_harvest4\polyphemus_20130301_test.nc
<http://polyphemus_20130301_test.nc>
47,48c49,50
<
/tmp/junit8062632297122653609/nc_harvest4/polyphemus_20130301_test.nc.bak
exists? true
< nc2
/home/ian/code/geotools/modules/plugin/coverage-multidim/netcdf/target/test-classes/org/geotools/coverage/io/netcdf/test-data/polyphemus_20130301_test_more_times.nc
<http://polyphemus_20130301_test_more_times.nc>
---
>
C:\Users\ian\AppData\Local\Temp\junit17289880738954782938\nc_harvest4\polyphemus_20130301_test.nc.bak
exists? true
> nc2
X:\geotools\modules\plugin\coverage-multidim\netcdf\target\test-classes\org\geotools\coverage\io\netcdf\test-data\polyphemus_20130301_test_more_times.nc
<http://polyphemus_20130301_test_more_times.nc>
51,52d52
< org.geotools.jdbc.JDBCDataStore getSQLTypeNames
< WARNING: Fetching fields from Database
Linux makes an extra (?) call to get the SQLTypeNames
54c54
< INFO: ACCEPTED:
/tmp/junit8062632297122653609/nc_harvest4/polyphemus_20130301_test.nc
<http://polyphemus_20130301_test.nc>
---
> INFO: ACCEPTED:
C:\Users\ian\AppData\Local\Temp\junit17289880738954782938\nc_harvest4\polyphemus_20130301_test.nc
<http://polyphemus_20130301_test.nc>
Linux has 4 granules rather than windows 2:
59,60d58
< SimpleFeatureImpl:O3=[SimpleFeatureImpl.Attribute: the_geom<the_geom
id=O3.5>=POLYGON ((4.9375 44.96875, 4.9375 50.96875, 14.9375 50.96875,
14.9375 44.96875, 4.9375 44.96875)), SimpleFeatureImpl.Attribute:
location<location id=O3.5>=polyphemus_20130301_test.nc
<http://polyphemus_20130301_test.nc>, SimpleFeatureImpl.Attribute:
imageindex<imageindex id=O3.5>=2, SimpleFeatureImpl.Attribute:
time<time id=O3.5>=2013-03-01 02:00:00.0]
< SimpleFeatureImpl:O3=[SimpleFeatureImpl.Attribute: the_geom<the_geom
id=O3.6>=POLYGON ((4.9375 44.96875, 4.9375 50.96875, 14.9375 50.96875,
14.9375 44.96875, 4.9375 44.96875)), SimpleFeatureImpl.Attribute:
location<location id=O3.6>=polyphemus_20130301_test.nc
<http://polyphemus_20130301_test.nc>, SimpleFeatureImpl.Attribute:
imageindex<imageindex id=O3.6>=3, SimpleFeatureImpl.Attribute:
time<time id=O3.6>=2013-03-01 03:00:00.0]
I've attached the full logs if anyone else wants to look. I'm
completely stumped by this but I don't really understand what the test
is doing or what subtle failures it could have?
Ian
--
Ian Turton
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
_______________________________________________
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
