You can make WCSCapabilitiesType implement Capabilities if you like; or you can rewrite that section of your version negotiation; WCSCapabilitiesType should have enough information (version and service).
I would go with the existing class if you can. Jody > Ah, I've just realised that WFSCapabilitiesType does not implement the > Capabilities interface, which is what I require. Do I simply make my > WCSCapabilitiesType class implement Capabilities? I see that the existing > class in net.opengis.wcs does not do this. > > Thanks, > > Jon > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/How-to-load-a-WCS-capabilities-document-tp2598821p2632406.html > Sent from the geotools-gt2-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. > Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-gt2-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
