On 12 July 2011 04:05, Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Btw, I was not aware that the rendering code was supposed to work without > JAI around.
Mmm... Unreliable memory is one of the first signs of age creeping up on you (I should know). We (Jody, you and me) have talked about this several times since the Sydney FOSS4G, but not for a while. I remember that when I was first trying to avoid the JAI requirement for the Quickstart app (rendering a shapefile) you suggested that since pure-java JAI can be downloaded via maven there was no need to worry about it - and after spending too much time stuffing around with reflection hacks in the swing module I now understand the wisdom of your advice :) But I'm unclear on whether some users are having problems when the JAI jars are only in their local maven repo rather than JAI being installed in a JRE or JDK dir ? Also Jody suggested that the JAI jars be marked as "provided" in the GeoTools pom, but I don't understand why. Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Geotools-gt2-users mailing list Geotools-gt2-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
