> On 12 July 2011 18:24, Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
>> My 2 cents: have JAI become a normal dependency and show people
>> how to exclude it in the unlikely case they can guarantee it will
>> be always available in the runtime
>>
>
> Sounds good.  Does anyone know a reason why we shouldn't do this ?

I have only one doubt about that. Where would the native libs go in that case?

Installing jai in the jre makes sure that the native libs are in the
library path.

Apart of that I also would prefer to have the jai automagically installed.

Ciao,
Andrea



>
> Michael
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
> Geotools-gt2-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Geotools-gt2-users mailing list
Geotools-gt2-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users

Reply via email to