Thanks, I will take a look at it. But still I think that the loginc in the WMSCoverageRenderer should be changed.
I could of course render wms layers separately, divide the render area in a way that the maximum size of the request is never violated, but this would disrupt the rendering order of the layers. Imagine that you have a feature layer with forests, wms layer with rivers and another feature layer with bridges. When you put layers in that order you will always see bridges above the rivers and rivers on the forests areas - as it should be. But imagine that I take the wms layer out and render it separately. How will I merge the two images to get the proper result where the feature layers are rendered on one picture and I should put the wms layer between forests and bridges ? -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Problem-with-printing-WMS-tp5181673p5182308.html Sent from the geotools-gt2-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ GeoTools-GT2-Users mailing list GeoTools-GT2-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
