On 28-05-15 19:22, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Mark Prins <mc.pr...@gmail.com > <mailto:mc.pr...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > 2015-05-28 16:33 GMT+02:00 Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it > <mailto:andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it>>: > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Mark Prins <mc.pr...@gmail.com > <mailto:mc.pr...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> I've been experimenting with a RELATE + DE-9IM matrix query and the > >> setMaxFeatures method on postgis and it appears that setting the max > >> features prevents returning proper results because the query to the > >> database sets a limit, but the filter is executed locally...(so only > >> run on the retrieved features) which leads to some unexpected results, > >> eg. no faatures returned, but count says there should be. > > > > > > Looks like a bug, if the filter is not completely encodable, we should > not > > encode > > limit and offset either. > > OK > > > Could you open a bug report? https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/projects/GEOT >
done: https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5135 Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ GeoTools-GT2-Users mailing list GeoTools-GT2-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users
