Sorry for asking again.
I'm just wondering about a fundamental configuration decision.
My configuration idea is to have two low cost GPS receivers, where one
of them is on a known position. Both issue just GPS position and log
time data
Is it enough to process just position and log time data (NMEA) from
base station as input to a tool like RTKlib (online or
postprocessing)?
Or is DGPS really only possible with GPS receivers (at base station)
which output ephemerides etc.?

Yours, Stefan

P.S. To Dan: Which inertia motion sensor and software did you (and and
typical Autopilots) use to do this sort of dead reckoning?

2011/2/4 Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[email protected]>:
>
> On 4 Feb 2011, at 15:52, Dan Lyke wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:17:09 +0100 Stefan Keller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> Now given that mobile phones can be connected to low-cost GPS (e.g.
>>> via bluetooth) it should be possible to implement at a "consumer DGPS"
>>> which gets an accurracy of 2m or better.
>> ..
>> Some of those low-cost consumer grade devices already integrate SBAS
>> (Space-Based Augmentations Services) correction  like WAAS, EGNOS and
>> MSAS, which can put them close to 2m. These systems work by having a
>> ...
>> However, a good portion of the additional error you're seeing with
>> cheap GPS receivers with tiny little antennas is probably multi-path
>> error, and DGPS won't help you with that.
>
> I got stuck on exactly that as well. And when I improved that - things where 
> far to large and heavy.
>
> Subsequently found that using a simple inertia motion sensor (this was for a 
> http://paparazzi.enac.fr/wiki/Autopilots board) to do relative stuff at < 
> 10cm combined with some very robust points from a GPS - though much less 
> accurate - was sort of a good compromise for periods of time under a few 
> hours.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dw.
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>

_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org

Reply via email to