I remember reading some kind of comparison of OS to Census/TIGER a few years 
ago from the perspective of value added activities—it highlighted the business 
value/investment added on to base map data and contrasted the then US 
experience with the UK charging for OS base data. Obviously the OS case isn't 
quite as relevant today, but wondering if anybody can remember seeing this 
post/study?

Thx


===
Ian White ::  Urban Mapping Inc
26 O'Farrell Street Suite 310  ::  San Francisco  CA  94108
T.415.946.8170 X800  ::  F.866.385.8266  ::  
urbanmapping.com<http://urbanmapping.com/>
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org

Reply via email to