Cool animation, positive stats. Keep up the good work, maybe OSM will make proprietary datasets irrelevant someday.
nym On 1/25/06, SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * @ 25/01/06 10:43:14 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > So what maps have been built on OSM so far? > > Depends exactly what you mean. Assuming it's not a rhetorical question > (no maps in the shops yet!) I'd point you at our stats > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/wiki/index.php/Stats > > and these animations > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/news/?p=28 > > for an idea of where we are and where we're heading. > > > > On 1/25/06, Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 09:48:34AM -0800, Tom Longson (nym) wrote: > > > > > > > Just curious if the wanking community is known by the google maps team. > > > > > > The _what_ team? I don't know what you're talking about. > > > > > > Oh, wait... now I think I remember. Wasn't that some proprietary > > > system that people used to use before there was Openstreetmap? > > > > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/ > > > > > > I had forgotten about them. I guess there are still some 'wankers > > > interested in proprietary data for nostalgia benefit. It takes all > > > kinds. > > > > > > ~ESP > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Geowanking mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Geowanking mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking > > have fun, > > SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.asklater.com/steve/ > _______________________________________________ > Geowanking mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking > _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
