David Fawcett wrote:
To follow up on Sean's comments, it may not be spam, but is sure smells like flame bait to draw more people to SlashGeo....
I see. What should I have done? Ask the OSGeo-Discuss list and Geowanking list and our internal mailing list separately? I could, but people commenting on list A would not benefit from the comments on lists B and C. To circumvent such a situation, I choose Slashgeo (ad-free non-profit) for obvious reasons. I tend to believe it somewhat worked because great comments were shared and the entire community can benefit from those comments, not only members of one particular mailing list.
That said, I'm open to suggestions. What should I do in such a situation? I want collaboration, not flames! ;-)
Have a nice day, Alex -- Alexandre Leroux, M.Sc., Ing. Environnement Canada / Environment Canada Centre météorologique canadien / Canadian Meteorological Centre Division de la réponse aux urgences environnementales / Environmental Emergency Response Division [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
