Brian (Grant):  your HTM sounds an awful lot like what ou find googling
"dutton qtm"

Hope that helps.

Cheers,
M Gould

-------
Michael Gould
Centro de Visualización Interactiva  www.cevi.uji.es
Dept. Information Systems (LSI), Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain
email: gould (at) lsi.uji.es  //  email2: mgould (at) opengeospatial.org
research group  www.geoinfo.uji.es  //  personal  www.mgould.com
AGILE www.agile-online.org
Vespucci Summer Institute www.vespucci.org
Erasmus Mundus: Master in Geospatial Technologies www.mastergeotech.info
 
 
 
 
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: miércoles, 13 de junio de 2007 20:05
To: [email protected]
Subject: Geowanking Digest, Vol 43, Issue 19

Send Geowanking mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Geowanking digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. RE: Sensor observations (brian grant)
   2. Re: Sensor observations (Andrew Turner)
   3. RE: Open Street View (Marc Pfister)
   4. Thank you, but 'no thank you' (Rupert Douglas-Bate)
   5. Re: Thank you, but 'no thank you' (Derrick J Brashear)
   6. Re: Thank you, but 'no thank you' (David William Bitner)
   7. Re: Thank you, but 'no thank you' (Andrew Turner)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:47:32 -0400
From: "brian grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [Geowanking] Sensor observations
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="iso-8859-1"

Allan - David - Andrew

Thanks very much for your thoughtful replies - I hope this community can
step up

my application - we build and program wireless sensor motes that collect
temperature and humidity as part of our customers' need to collect corrosion
data on remote and moving samples; our motes are connected to gateways that
provide real time graphing via the web.



my proposal for a recursive geospatial reference is this: a modified
Hierarchical Triangular Mesh (HTM) - please bear with me on this - I need to
understand if my description makes sense to this community. ultimately I'm
looking for an application that can locate lat/log points into triangular
areas designated as follows:

for those familiar with HTM, please imagine using a consistent numerical
base for the initial spherical division (major triads) and subsequent inner
divisions (minor triads)

for an easily translatable example let's assume a base-8/octahedral system
where a major triad boundary is defined as perhaps north of the equator and
between 0 and 90 deg. longitude.  this is a common HTM method. my
modification of the conventional begins with the desginations of subsequent
minor triads.

the octahedral or major triad is subdivided into 64 (8^2) first minor
triads: an 8-frequency octahedron.

for minor triad designations imagine the row of base triangles from east to
west designated 07 to 70 (07, 16, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70).

rows are designated by a 2x8 matrix where each subsequent row (of same
polarity) is designated by a circular shift of this matrix.

subsequent minor triad boundaries are subdivided by the same method
resulting in a recursive geospatial reference of ever increasing resolution.

one interesting note is that this method creates a longitudinal component
for each triad: the vertical row of minor triads perpendicular from the apex
to the base become designated 00, 77, 11, 66, 22, 55, 33, 44 (with
alternating polarity). the same holds true for other regular trianuglar
polyhedra - tetrahedral and icosahedral.

the "address" of a given area would look something like: 07:56.72.84.01 if
xx:aa.bb.cc.dd then xx is the major triad and subsequent are recursively
minor triads. the speed of lookup for it would be very fast with limitless
attributes located on different databases.

clear as mud? this is my stab at the problem - the inner triangular
designations seem to separate one HTM method from another. this one is truly
recursive, incorporates the polarity of each triangular area and contains a
longitudinal component.

my apologies for having to invent some language to explain this - I'm open
to suggestions as to more conventional terms.


 - brian grant



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Allan Doyle
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 10:44 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Sensor observations
>
>
> Addendum to my earlier message...
>
>
> The other good news is that I suspect the geowanking community could
> go a long way to working out the data catalog/search/access problems
> in a new, useful way.
>
> There are some interesting things going on:
>
>   1. Open Search geo extensions
>      http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/Extensions/
> Geo/1.0/Draft_1
>
>   2. OSGeo Geodata Committee
>      http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Public_Geospatial_Data_Project
>
>   3. OSGeo DCLite4G
>      http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/DCLite4G
>
>   4. Google's KML search
>      http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article_id=2409
>
> There's plenty of material about the existing geo-search activities
> out there. Google for "ogc catalog", "spatial data infrastructure",
> "fgdc metadata", etc.
>
> The problem seems so easy. Identify a point in space. Decide what
> kind of data you want. Find the data. The axle people get wrapped
> around is that they then have to decide on a whole bunch of stuff
> that will support doing that and it's never clear how much yak-
> shaving is happening, how much institutional rivalry is happening,
> how much legacy inertia is happening, etc.
>
>       ALlan
>
>
> On Jun 13, 2007, at 10:21, David Fawcett wrote:
>
> > __ Brian,
> >
> > I am interested in this topic as well.  We have a system to make
> > Minnesota air quality data available to the public.  It consists of
> > point sources, ambient data from monitoring stations, and Air
> > Quality Index data for regional areas.  I am always interested in
> > looking at new ways to store, slice, represent, and publish this
> > type of information.
> >
> > David Fawcett
> >
> > On 6/13/07, Allan Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 13, 2007, at 09:24, brian grant wrote:
> >
> > > pardon my impressions as I've lurked this site for years and read
> > this
> > > thread with some amusement.
> > >
> > > the street view focus on the visual seems to be an effort to
> > > capture the
> > > transient but my needs are to capture repeatedly over time and not
> > > just the
> > > visual - I need temperature, humidity, particulate and other
> > > atmospheric
> > > data.
> > >
> > > I'm not necessarily looking for a way to commercialize or publish
> > > data - I'm
> > > here trying to find an appropriate geospatial reference that
> > > defines area
> > > not points - recursive areas of ever increasing resolution that fit
> > > nicely
> > > into a database schema or even file directory structure.
> >
> > You are on to something. The environmental data you seek is being
> > gathered by a number of groups in a number of formats with a number
> > of different metadata schemas in a number of different repositories.
> > The "appropriate geospatial reference" you seek should be something
> > that you can then use to query for, find, and extract the data you
> > are looking for.
> >
> > I think in the long run, it's easier to build OpenStreetView than to
> > build something that lets you do what you want.
> >
> > The good news is that a lot of smart people have been working on your
> > problem. The bad news is that they have been working for a long time
> > and it's not clear that they have come up with a viable solution, nor
> > is a viable solution anywhere on the horizon.
> >
> >         Allan
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  -  brian grant
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Geowanking mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
> >
> > --
> > Allan Doyle
> > +1.781.433.2695
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geowanking mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
> >
> --
> Allan Doyle
> +1.781.433.2695
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
>



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:08:03 -0400
From: "Andrew Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Sensor observations
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 6/13/07, brian grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my proposal for a recursive geospatial reference is this: a modified
> Hierarchical Triangular Mesh (HTM) - please bear with me on this - I need
to
> understand if my description makes sense to this community. ultimately I'm
> looking for an application that can locate lat/log points into triangular
> areas designated as follows:
>

This is another topic altogether as well (wow, people are coming out
of the woodwork - keep it up! :)

There is a definite interest in defining some type of grid system for
use in hierarchical addressing and search.

C-Squares was developed originally for oceanic measurement:
http://www.cmar.csiro.au/csquares/

Geotude is being developed for addressing:
http://www.geotude.com/

And of course - there are always absurd patents to be looked at:
"Geographic location referencing system and method"
  http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5839088.html
 - which was awarded to Go2 software - used for "Mobile Yellow Pages"
(yippee)


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:14:49 -0700
From: "Marc Pfister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [Geowanking] Open Street View
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"

Did this get brought up yet:

http://everyscape.com/

More panos with a little extra special sauce on top.


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:49:13 +0100
From: "Rupert Douglas-Bate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Geowanking] Thank you, but 'no thank you'
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

13th June


Dear Sir or Madam

I love the friendship and good will behind the lists that come
through. However, practically speaking, I cannot handle the number of
emails, it is too much.

Regretfully, please remove my name. I need a more filtered service. Thank
you.

Rupert Douglas-Bate
founder GMA

-- 
www.globalmapaid.rdvp.org

STOP PRESS: jobs at GMA go to home page www.globalmapaid.rdvp.org

Global MapAid is a member of The Enterprise Network of Silicon Valley
(TEN) - a successful incubator for the commercial and not-for-profit
sector.
www.tensv.org

"There comes a special moment in everyone's life, a moment for which
that person was born. That special opportunity, when he seizes it,
will fulfil his mission - a mission for which he is uniquely
qualified. In that moment, he finds greatness. It is his finest hour."

Winston Churchill.


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:52:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Thank you, but 'no thank you'
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

There's information at the bottom of every message to the list. We didn't 
all subscribe you, perhaps you could take the effort to unsubscribe 
yourself instead of spamming hundreds of people who can't help you?

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Rupert Douglas-Bate wrote:

> 13th June
>
>
> Dear Sir or Madam
>
> I love the friendship and good will behind the lists that come
> through. However, practically speaking, I cannot handle the number of
> emails, it is too much.
>
> Regretfully, please remove my name. I need a more filtered service. Thank 
> you.

> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
>


------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:01:57 -0500
From: "David William Bitner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Thank you, but 'no thank you'
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

But he was sooooo polite.

On 6/13/07, Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There's information at the bottom of every message to the list. We didn't
> all subscribe you, perhaps you could take the effort to unsubscribe
> yourself instead of spamming hundreds of people who can't help you?
>
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Rupert Douglas-Bate wrote:
>
> > 13th June
> >
> >
> > Dear Sir or Madam
> >
> > I love the friendship and good will behind the lists that come
> > through. However, practically speaking, I cannot handle the number of
> > emails, it is too much.
> >
> > Regretfully, please remove my name. I need a more filtered service.
> Thank
> > you.
>
> > Geowanking mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
>



-- 
************************************
David William Bitner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.burri.to/pipermail/geowanking/attachments/20070613/274cd966/att
achment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:04:46 -0400
From: "Andrew Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Geowanking] Thank you, but 'no thank you'
To: [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Rupert - there is also a "digest" format that would limit to 1 email a
day with all the archives. That way you can still have the emails in
case something interesting comes up, but not be "flooded" or have to
create a filter/folder.

Andrew

On 6/13/07, David William Bitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But he was sooooo polite.
>
>
> On 6/13/07, Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's information at the bottom of every message to the list. We
didn't
> > all subscribe you, perhaps you could take the effort to unsubscribe
> > yourself instead of spamming hundreds of people who can't help you?
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Rupert Douglas-Bate wrote:
> >
> > > 13th June
> > >
> > >
> > > Dear Sir or Madam
> > >
> > > I love the friendship and good will behind the lists that come
> > > through. However, practically speaking, I cannot handle the number of
> > > emails, it is too much.
> > >
> > > Regretfully, please remove my name. I need a more filtered service.
> Thank
> > > you.
> >
> > > Geowanking mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geowanking mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ************************************
> David William Bitner
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
>
>


-- 
Andrew Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      42.2774N x 83.7611W
http://highearthorbit.com              Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking


End of Geowanking Digest, Vol 43, Issue 19
******************************************

_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

Reply via email to