On 25/06/2007, at 8:19 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Well, it might qualify as arrogant to think I'll just take your word on this.

Of course, though I was hoping that the merits of the point made is independent of how famous I am... even if I was Noam Chomsky, a healthy degree of scepticism is still worthwhile!

I think you would have to provide a more detailed explanation
of what it is the GIS folks have wrong and why it is our problem to
resolve it.

I believe that the goals and aims of geographical systems is to connect people with available information. While the general populace is not regularly using such systems, then I would deem those systems as failed. The first real success will be when the general populace routinely use such systems, and we're starting to see the first hints of that with Google Maps.

I acknowledge that this is an arbitrary measure that ignores the many years of useful results that have been extracted from GIS systems, however I anticipate the days where mobile phones and monitor glasses provide augmented reality overlays, and believe that we need to have systems that can handle the full range of the human experience.

In particular, I remember reading a section of Feynman's autobiography where he noted with amazement that students in his physics classes didn't make the connection between polarised light and the reflected sunlight coming off a lake of water. I would love to render additional information over the human senses, so that polarisation is visible.

The long term objective would be to allow people to directly perceive long term trends and collected information, rather than reacting only to immediate stimuli. Unfortunately, GIS is self-selecting itself out of this domain of research, despite specifically being named as though it should be handling this kind of thing.

On the other hand, I don't define my project in terms of standards, and I free go beyond them, or develop my own approaches where there is nothing
appropriate.

Sounds like a well balanced approach. Thanks for responding.

Steve.

--
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking

Reply via email to