I quite like the series that the Guardian did on this, though it's a twelve-parter, so you'd have to be selective: <http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/series/climate-wars-hacked-emails.%20 The%20folks%20at%20Realclimate.org> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/series/climate-wars-hacked-emails. The folks at Realclimate.org did several responses to the series, and the Guardian then responded, so you could afford the students a real birds-eye view of both the allegations and the process of unpacking them through different lenses. wil
Dr. Wil Burns, Editor in Chief Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy 1702 Arlington Blvd. El Cerrito, CA 94530 USA Ph: 650.281.9126 Fax: 510.779.5361 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] <http://www.jiwlp.com/> http://www.jiwlp.com SSRN site (selected publications): <http://ssrn.com/author=240348> http://ssrn.com/author=240348 Skype ID: Wil.Burns From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dawson, Jane I. (Government) Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [gep-ed] Climate-gate readings? Several months ago, we were all immersed in the "climate-gate" scandal and there was lots of great commentary on the listserv. I'm trying to prepare a mid-level undergraduate class for a debate on climate science & uncertainty, and I would like to assign a few short, provocative articles that 1)tell the climate skeptic side of the climate-gate story/and or more recent criticism of the IPCC FAR; 2)defend the integrity of the IPCC epi-com; and 3)accept uncertainty and nonetheless argue for action. Do any of you have favorites to recommend? (And would you add any other perspective(s) to the debate?) Thanks! Jane To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gep-ed+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gep-ed+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
