Hi all,

I'm working on a paper about whether the political vs. legal status of the
Copenhagen Accord matters.  So I'm looking for empirical studies comparing
the effectiveness of legal vs. non-legal agreements -- for example, studies
that compare the effectiveness of the Cairo Guidelines on hazardous wastes
with the Basel Convention, or the voluntary UNEP/FAO PIC procedures for
chemicals and pesticides with the Rotterdam Convention.  I know there's some
theoretical writing on this topic (for example, in the legalization issue of
IO), and some studies arguing for the effectiveness of soft law (in
Shelton's book on Commitment and Compliance).  But what I'm most interested
in are comparative studies of legal and non-legal agreements.  So if you're
aware of any (either in the environmental arena or in international
relations more generally), please let me know.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Best regards
Dan Bodansky

Reply via email to