Dear GEPers,


Colleagues and I have a new article out that examines political polarization 
over environmental protection in the US from 1974 to 2012, employing the NORC 
spending item.  While it focuses on the US, obviously, it may help shed slight 
on our odd situation relative to most of the rest of the industrialized world 
when it comes to polarization over environmental issues.   It also provides 
support for the argument that Peter Jacques and I and several others have made 
that the dissolution of the USSR in 1991 and the rise of global 
environmentalism (symbolized by the 1992 Rio Summit) stimulated the 
Conservative Movement (especially elites) to substitute a "green scare" for the 
declining red one.  Below is the title/abstract.  SSR is widely available in 
libraries so if you're interested you should be able to find it.



Riley Dunlap



"Political polarization on support for government spending on environmental 
protection in the USA, 1974-2012,"  Social Science Research 48 (2014):251-260.

Aaron M. McCright, Chenyang Xiao and Riley E. Dunlap



ABSTRACT:



Since the early 1990s, the American conservative movement has become 
increasingly hostile

toward environmental protection and Congressional Republicans have become 
increasingly

anti-environmental in their voting records. Party sorting theory holds that such

political polarization among elites will likely extend to the general public. 
Analyzing General

Social Survey data from 1974 to 2012, we examine whether political polarization 
has

occurred on support for government spending on environmental protection over 
this time

period in the US general public. We find that there has been significant 
partisan and ideological

polarization on support for environmental spending since 1992--consistent with

the expectations of party sorting theory. This political polarization on 
environmental concern

in the general public will likely endure save for political convergence on 
environmental

concern among elites in the near future. Such polarization likely will inhibit 
the further

development and implementation of environmental policy and the diffusion of 
environmentally

friendly behaviors.






-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to