Hi, all, 

 

We keep returning to the constant connections between energy and power.

 

John Mikler and I wrote our recently published book Capitalism for All: 
Realizing its Liberal Promise long before Ukraine became a major international 
problem. In that book we argued that massive transnational corporations 
(“MegaCorps”) have been granted power over policy by many governments, not 
least by the US. The guiding ideology of “CorpoCapitalism” (commonly mistaken 
for neoliberalism) assumes that supporting MegaCorps enhances economic growth 
that, in turn, automatically raises social welfare. Recent political ructions 
(e.g. Trump) are evidence (in addition to technical measures) that this 
ideology has led to growing inequality, environmental destruction, and social 
unrest. With this power MegaCorps are able to block the technological 
innovation that is needed for a rapid transition of energy systems away from 
fossil fuels (“climate innovation”). Unless there is no foreseeable profit, 
there is no ‘business case’ for them to do the necessary research. 

 

We argue that governments need to take back the power they have ceded and 
govern for all the people.  We call this “Liberal Capitalism”, that frees the 
people as capitalism was initially intended to do. All rich country governments 
support technological innovation both directly through government labs and 
grants (e.g. to Universities) and indirectly through tax expenditures. If 
governments governed for all the people—not just for MegaCorps, their 
executives and investors—they would redirect all their support for innovation 
to developing the basic and applied science of the new energy production and 
consumption systems required to mitigate GHG emissions. Every possible pathway 
to increased efficiency of renewable energy production, energy storage, and 
energy consumption should be explored. I understand Miranda’s (and Japan’s) 
rejection of nuclear energy. However, there is probably a role for innovation 
into nuclear energy production, safety, and waste recycling or treatment. 

If Europe and the West can wean itself off fossil fuels, it can protect itself 
from Russia and the Earth from climate change. 

 

Cheers, 

 

Neil

 

Neil E. Harrison, Ph.D. 
Executive Director
The Sustainable Development Institute ( <http://www.sd-institute.org/> 
www.sd-institute.org) 

 

Publications

Co-Author (with Robert Geyer), Governing Complexity in the 21st Century. 
(Abingdon: Routledge 2022).  
<https://www.routledge.com/Governing-Complexity-in-the-21st-Century/Harrison-Geyer/p/book/9780367276270>
 
https://www.routledge.com/Governing-Complexity-in-the-21st-Century/Harrison-Geyer/p/book/9780367276270.

 

Co-Author (with John Mikler), Capitalism for All: Realizing its Liberal Promise 
(SUNY Press 2022).  <https://www.sunypress.edu/p-7234-capitalism-for-all.aspx> 
https://www.sunypress.edu/p-7234-capitalism-for-all.aspx.

 

Author, Sustainable Capitalism and the Pursuit of Well-Being (Abingdon: 
Routledge 2014) -   <http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415662819> 
www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415662819

 

Co-Editor (with John Mikler), Climate Innovation: Liberal Capitalism and 
Climate Change (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2014) -  
<http://us.macmillan.com/climateinnovation/NeilEHarrison> 
http://us.macmillan.com/climateinnovation/NeilEHarrison.

 

Editor, Complexity in World Politics: Concepts and Methods of a New Paradigm 
(Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2006).  
<https://www.sunypress.edu/p-4294-complexity-in-world-politics.aspx> 
https://www.sunypress.edu/p-4294-complexity-in-world-politics.aspx.

 

Co-editor with Gary Bryner, Science and Politics in the International 
Environment (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004). 
https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=10071

 

Author, Constructing Sustainable Development (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2000). 
See  <https://sunypress.edu/Books/C/Constructing-Sustainable-Development> 
https://sunypress.edu/Books/C/Constructing-Sustainable-Development

 

 

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Schreurs, 
Miranda
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2022 1:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [gep-ed] Sent the wrong link

 

Hi all, 

 

I just saw I sent the wrong link on the Japanese PMs critique.  Sorry about 
that. The right one is here. http://genjiren.com/2022/01/27/jointstatement/

 

Now I will stop bombarding the list….  

 

Best, miranda





Am 26.02.2022 um 20:20 schrieb Schreurs, Miranda <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >:

 

Hi Aseem, Hello al, 

 

Thanks for your commentary. It is informative. But I don’t agree with all of 
your assessments. Working as co-chair of a committee dealing with high level 
radioactive waste management, I can not agree with you that nuclear energy is 
the path forward. It also takes much too long to build. European experience 
shows that countries that heavily invest in nuclear, are slow to build out 
renewables. They are also at risk of big supply problems if they become too 
heavily dependent on nuclear. 

 

Germany will most certainly be expanding its renewable energy push. It is 
currently getting about 50% of its electricity from renewables (up from 6% in 
2000: actually in the first two months of 2022 it has been getting well over 
50%). With the Ukraine crisis, the expansion of renewables will be putting into 
fast speed. There are still many ways to enhance energy efficiency and energy 
savings. Plans are to be climate neutral by 2045 with 65% renewables by 2030.  
I think we might now get there as early as 2025 or 2027.

 

In response to a request from Peace Boat in Japan, I wrote the attached memo 
this morning. It is in response to the following statement from five former 
Japanese prime ministers criticising the EU’s sustainability taxonomy which 
lists both natural gas and nuclear as sustainable 
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXNi2gLjxm). I agree with their critique.

 

 

 

 

My response is attached.

 

Best, Miranda

 

 

<Five PMs critique of taxonomy.pdf> 

 





Am 26.02.2022 um 20:02 schrieb Aseem Prakash <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >:

 

Hi Miranda (and GEP community): 

 

Thanks for your thoughtful comments on the Ukraine crisis. Here is a commentary 
that Nives and I published in  <http://forbes.com/> Forbes.com: "Ukraine Crisis 
is Terrible News for Climate Policy." 

 

Abstract:

Effective decarbonization cannot be separated from energy security. Rising gas 
prices mean that fracked shale gas is back. About two dozen U.S. gas tankers 
are headed to Europe and an additional 33 might follow. Moreover, renewable 
energy will not create energy self-sufficiency as long as China controls the 
renewable energy supply chain, especially the critical minerals. Western 
democracies should invest in domestic mining while taking into account the 
concerns of local communities. The climate movement needs to reconsider its 
opposition to nuclear energy and carbon capture because the Ukraine crisis may 
have revied the fortunes of the fossil fuel industry, at least in the short 
term.

 

Here is the commentary:

 
<https://www.forbes.com/sites/prakashdolsak/2022/02/23/ukraine-crisis-is-terrible-news-for-climate-policy/?sh=2fa73d7d5041>
 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/prakashdolsak/2022/02/23/ukraine-crisis-is-terrible-news-for-climate-policy/?sh=2fa73d7d5041
 

 

​If you cannot access it, please email me and I will send you a PDF.

 

Best,

 

Aseem 



____________________________________________________________

 

ASEEM PRAKASH
Professor, Department of Political Science
Walker Family Professor for the College of Arts and Sciences
Founding Director, UW Center for Environmental Politics
University of Washington, Seattle
 <http://aseemprakash.net/> aseemprakash.net

 

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > on behalf of 
Schreurs, Miranda <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2022 10:44 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: [gep-ed] The Ukraine invasion democracy and energy transitions 

 

Dear GEP-EDers

I am totally distracted and disgusted by what is going on in the Ukraine.  
Putin’s march into the Ukraine is frightening. It reminds me of what happened 
in Poland, Czechoslovakia, central and Eastern Europe.  I grew up in a 
neighbourhood of Europeans who fled the Soviet Union’s invasions of the past 
(Prague Spring). The potential for a break out of a larger war is real and a 
Cold War is certainly back. Putin has taken Europe and to some extent the US on 
a ride — and the west fell into his net.  He pursued the game of economic 
cooperation and interdependence, with major European and especially German 
companies become heavily dependent on Russian resources. Germany is about 50 
percent dependent on Russia for its gas supplies and is also highly dependent 
on its oil and coal. 

Europe did not imagine what is now unfolding. Over the years, NATO forces have 
been weakened.  And despite what happened with the annexation of Crimea (in the 
Ukraine) and parts of Georgia, the West did little to deter what is now coming 
to light as a long planned strategy on Putin’s part to rebuild at least parts 
of the Soviet empire. NATO is now scrambling to strengthen border defences and 
alliances.  Hopefully the sanctions which have been introduced will have some 
impact. I understand that more are in planning. For the Ukraine, we have to 
hope that the aid and the sanctions are not much too little, much too late.

On top of the populists and authoritarian leaders who have sprung up in so many 
countries, this invasion really calls for us all to do more to speak up for 
freedom and democracy. It is also a call to speed up our energy transitions. We 
need greater energy efficiency, energy savings and renewable energies to break 
the dependency on authoritarian regimes. Especially Europe but also the US, 
Japan, and S Korea  have paid into the coffers of Russia (and other dictatorial 
regimes) with our large appetites for fossil fuels. 

So, in response, I turned down my heat even further (it was already off in most 
rooms), wrote an article, and have participated in panels talking about what is 
going on with Russia and why democracy is in serious danger if we are not 
prepared to ourselves pay a price to protect it.  One way of doing this in the 
medium- to long-term is an energy transition. This will be important for 
climate change but also for the fight against authoritarianism. 

This is obviously an over simplification of a very complex situation, and I 
know that you all know this, but I somehow felt the need to say something….

Wishing for the best for the Ukraine…. 

Miranda Schreurs
Professor for Environment and Climate Policy
Technical University of Munich


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to  <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit  
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/8D355445-F221-4F57-9DB5-EC0436B3DE67%40hfp.tum.de>
 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/8D355445-F221-4F57-9DB5-EC0436B3DE67%40hfp.tum.de.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to  <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit  
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/CO1PR08MB7644817CFC79502AE3D6D4C2DD3F9%40CO1PR08MB7644.namprd08.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/CO1PR08MB7644817CFC79502AE3D6D4C2DD3F9%40CO1PR08MB7644.namprd08.prod.outlook.com.

 

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/F0A39039-2513-4EB1-94FF-E99E7114F8B3%40hfp.tum.de
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/F0A39039-2513-4EB1-94FF-E99E7114F8B3%40hfp.tum.de?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/011101d82b68%242ece1300%248c6a3900%24%40sd-institute.org.

Reply via email to