Dear all

I hope the below is of interest to some!

Cheers

Mat


Workshop on Green energy transitions and global disruption: The (un)just 
transition to Net Zero
University of Manchester, 11-13 September 2024
Call for expressions of interest

We invite expressions to participate in a workshop on ‘Green energy transitions 
and global disruption’, to be held at the University of Manchester on 11-13 
September, 2024. The goal of the workshop is to build conversations among 
researchers about the political economy of energy transitions, focused on the 
question of their disruptive qualities. This is as part of a project funded 
internally at Manchester with the same title. One of the goals of the project 
is to build new networks of researchers and potential future research activity 
on this theme. You will see a longer description of our project below.

The workshop is a key part of pursuing that goal. We envisage it therefore as a 
creative site of interaction to generate new ideas rather than simply to 
present existing work. We have already confirmed participation from a number of 
leading scholars in the field and are now seeking expressions of interest from 
others.
We have some funds to support participation in the workshop. We will prioritise 
the use of those funds partly in relation to the strength of the connection to 
our project theme, but also to promote the participation of scholars from the 
global South, early career researchers, and from groups traditionally 
marginalised within universities.

Given the logic of the workshop design, we do not seek abstracts for papers. 
Instead, please can you send us a short (max. one-page) statement of interest 
in the workshop, responding to these questions:

  1.  How does your current work speak to the overall themes of the workshop 
and are there any specific aspects it speaks particularly to?
  2.  What do you think the most important and interesting aspects of the 
political economy of green energy transitions are to focus on in the next few 
years?
Please send these along with a CV to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, 
copying 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, by 
12th June 2024. We will let people know about participation by the end of June.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Best wishes
Mat Paterson, Sandra Barragán, Pritish Behuria, Sam Hickey, James Jackson, 
Silke Trommer.

Green energy transitions and global disruption: The (un)just transition to Net 
Zero
Aims and objectives
The project has two principal aims.
First, to examine the distributive dynamics of the Green energy transitions 
(GETs) that are central to the global response to climate change. It focuses in 
particular on the disruptive qualities of GETs as well as the current 
geopolitical contexts in which they are unfolding. It pursues these dynamics in 
four ways:

  *   Disruptions produced by shifts away from fossil fuels – to fossil fuel 
producing regions, industries dependent on fossil fuels extraction, production 
and export as a key feature of the domestic economy.
  *   Disruptions produced by shifts to renewable energy and electrification – 
critical minerals, geopolitical shifts, trade patterns, to meet the demands for 
zero carbon technology.
  *   Disruptions produced by ongoing global crises to these supply chains and 
thus to the dynamics of clean energy transitions – COVID (lockdowns and 
recovery), and Ukraine (natural gas inflation and supply disruption, consequent 
return of inflation) on the supply of clean technologies.
  *   Disruptions produced by the shift to industrial strategy as part of the 
pursuit of GETs – trade conflicts, geopolitical rivalries over resource access, 
notably.
Second, to develop a global network of researchers working on these as the 
basis for a much larger examination of the politics and political economy of 
GETs. The research carried out in the project will provide the groundwork for a 
major application involving scholars from multiple countries, notably in both 
global North and South, to investigate in much greater detail the dynamics 
shaping the distributional dynamics of GETs. A significant area of activity 
within the project will be building this research network. Existing team 
members already have considerable links from previous projects but this will be 
pursued systematically to generate external grant applications.

Context and rationale
GETs involve shifting the global economy away from fossil fuels to renewable 
energy systems, reducing energy demand in high consumption areas and expanding 
energy access to those currently excluded. All of these processes are central 
to the global response to climate change and the pursuit of decarbonisation/Net 
Zero. They can be highly variable in form, given choices of technology, the 
social organisation of energy resources, and the distribution of benefits and 
costs of the transition. While most research into GETs has been focused on 
socio-technical innovation, the IPCC 6th Assessment Report (2021) confirmed 
that a key knowledge gap in accelerating transformative energy transitions 
concerns the politics of such transitions. Key political barriers include the 
power of incumbent actors, policy and institutional legacies, ideological 
preferences and imaginaries, and the relationships of governments with social 
movements. And where significant transformations have occurred (e.g. coal 
phaseouts in various countries), this is largely because they have aligned with 
states’ political-economic strategies. At the heart of such transitions are 
questions of ‘who gets what, when and how’, as they have inevitably disruptive 
distributive effects, potentially generating conflicts, with profound 
distributive effects. As the global economy edges closer to the Net Zero 
objectives by 2050, how the global disruptions caused by GETs are managed by 
actors at various scales will determine whether it is a ‘just’ or indeed 
‘unjust’ transition.

There is some research on the politics of such transitions (Scoones et al 2015; 
Breetz et al 2018, Hochstetler 2020), particularly on industry resistance to 
climate policy (Newell & Paterson 1998). However, such research is fragmented 
in various ways: between work on the global South (Behuria 2020; Millington & 
Scheba 2020; Lavers 2023) and global North (Lockwood et al 2019; Tobin 2017); 
between work focused on different specific sectors, and across different 
theoretical traditions. Strategies for pursuing GETs are central to addressing 
the climate emergency and shaping the future of the global economy.

However, the last decade has seen a number of shifts that increase the 
importance of this sort of research. First, the increased ambition of climate 
action, shifting from incremental cuts in emissions to transformational 
approaches to ‘Net Zero’, and eliminating fossil fuels from the global economy, 
has dramatically raised the stakes in understanding the drivers – mostly 
political-economic – of these transformations both in terms of the elimination 
of fossil fuels and the aggressive promotion of renewable energy and 
electrification (Paterson 2020). Second, the shift in policy approaches by 
major economies, from market-led climate strategies towards industrial 
strategy, has considerable potential for pursuing GETs but raises novel 
political questions about the coalitions that support these policies, the just 
transition dynamics, and the conflicts with governance norms especially in the 
trade system. Third, the crises starting in 2020 with the onset of COVID-19, 
have given considerable impetus to focusing on energy security in ways that 
interact with the pursuit of GETs in ways that we don’t fully understand. These 
three shifts make it even more imperative to focus on the disruptive politics 
of GETs in terms of the global production, distribution, and consumption 
process that they are in the process of transforming.

The project’s work is grounded in political economy approaches (Paterson & 
X-Laberge 2018) that focus on the centrality of economic processes (production, 
distribution, finance, consumption) and their key social dynamics (ownership 
structures, power relations, technological innovation; social inequalities, 
global integration and restructuring, formal/informal economy dynamics, 
socioenvironmental degradation) in political and policymaking processes. These 
approaches provide overarching frameworks for understanding how the power 
relations and inequalities produced within the economy are crucial to 
understanding the possibility of and dynamics of GETs. It also draws our 
attention to the complexity and heterogeneity of these transitions. There are 
significant variations in ownership of energy resources and power relations 
across different provisioning systems in which energy is central (housing, 
industry, food, transport, electricity), as well as great variation globally 
regarding these relations. Transforming energy systems also entails multiple 
sites and forms of intervention from mining and extraction through to final 
energy use. They have shaped and will continue to shape the patterns of how 
those transitions are being pursued, the extent of ambition in transitioning 
away from fossil fuels, and who wins and who loses from energy transitions. The 
global interconnectedness of energy markets, supply chains and pathways to 
decarbonisation requires a focus on countries in multiple regions, North and 
South, including how policy ideas travel globally and inform strategies at 
various levels of government.

Much is already known regarding the way that the transition from fossil fuels 
as key to the response to climate change generates various forms of economic 
disruption. Some of this knowledge demonstrates that supply chains are 
important components of this disruption. We have some knowledge about aspects 
of the politics of this – the socio-ecological conflicts and environmental 
justice issues at sites of extraction for critical minerals for example. But 
there are various under-explored aspects of the political conflicts involved in 
these supply chain disruptions that this focus seeks to concentrate on. 
Attention to these supply chain issues has been heightened by the crises 
unfolding since the onset of COVID-19 in early 2020, which have disrupted 
supply chains across the globe in various ways, with important lessons to learn 
for the pursuit of net zero energy transitions.  The focus of the research 
accordingly concerns the (un)just implications of the GET across the world 
following the disruptive impact of COVID-19 and inflation. As these crises have 
only hasted the need to achieve to ensure energy security and mitigate against 
future supply chain disruption through low carbon technologies. Recent and 
present crises have consequently made Net Zero a political and economy 
imperative as much as a climate objective, in turn raising questions over the 
disruptive impacts. The project is therefore designed to integrate analyses 
across the global North and global South, with analytical attention to 
similarities, differences, and the interconnectedness of such transitions 
across these regions.

Team and Project Management
The core project consists of members of the Sustainable Consumption Institute 
(SCI), Politics Department, and the Global Development Institute (GDI) to draw 
on the interdisciplinary expertise of members of the institutes. The overall 
project director is Matthew Paterson (SCI/Politics), and the other core team 
members will be Sam Hickey, Pritish Behuria, Silke Trommer, and James Jackson. 
The project employs Sandra Barragán-Contreras as a postdoctoral research 
associate who is carrying out primary research within the project as well as 
help organise the online and in-person workshops.


--
Matthew Paterson
Director, Sustainable Consumption Institute/Dept of Politics
University of Manchester

New book out - In Search of Climate 
Politics<https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/in-search-of-climate-politics/C7A9A41385614D553869603D91ABA6E6>
Recent articles: Climate change and international political economy: between 
collapse and 
transformation<https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09692290.2020.1830829>
Climate Governance Antagonisms: Policy Stability and 
Repoliticization<https://muse.jhu.edu/article/848649/summary> (with Paul Tobin 
and Stacy VanDeveer)
National climate institutions complement targets and 
policies<https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.abm1157> (with Navroz 
Dubash and 10 others)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/CWXP265MB13341F75C1F7DD3301CB82E7A2122%40CWXP265MB1334.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.

Reply via email to