> > 1. Managing the EJB's using reflection > 2. Managing the EJB's through dynamic proxies > 3. Managing the EJB's using JMX >
i think it should be possible to have many different implementations of the EJB container and the user(admin) should then decide whichone he is using ... the rule: --- Geronimo has one and only one EJB Container, but the implementation of the EJB container should differ --- is a good one the first question that i have is: what should be the contract / interface between Geronimo and its EJBContainer? ould the beans be deployed thru Geronimo to the EJB container or directly to the container or both should a method call be fired thru: Geronimo -> EJB container -> bean -> method EJB container -> bean -> method how about transactions .... :-) oh i think transaction + ejb container is the central piece of code :-) chris
