What do you mean about dynamic proxies? Is it one of the design patterns? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lyytinen Joonas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 7:43 PM Subject: RE: how about maven?
Hi everyone, I'm new to the list and don't know how much general discussion around this has allready been had, but before starting the implementation of the EJB container a good deal of though probably should be given to the implementation architecture of the EJB container. AFAIK currently there are three approaches to the EJB problem domain 1. Managing the EJB's using reflection 2. Managing the EJB's through dynamic proxies 3. Managing the EJB's using JMX Of these, the last one is newest and thus has the least references. There is a good academic study on the first two approaches (http://www.cs.rice.edu/CS/Systems/DynaServer/perf_scalability_ejb.pdf) which states that there is no major performance differences between the two. Has anyone any experiences with the JMX approach and data of it's performance? Maybe it would be beneficial to build small POC's of each before starting the proper implementation? > how about MX4J code, I see the code is > under License: Apache Software License > that a good thing :-)
