On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Guenther, Kurt - NASHCCON wrote:
> I've seen the reflection approach work out very well to the point where
> generated code was no longer necessary to support EJB's. When you see Sun's
> CTS, you'll see where this would be valuable and it also lends itself to a
> fluid development environment.
Some level of generated code (or generated bytecode) is always
going to be necessary for CMP, though, since CMP EJB classes are abstract.
Right?
Aaron
> I'm somewhat inclined to think reflection as a modus operandi for Geronimo's
> backplane would be a good thing.
