Got me there. Yes, CMP is usually easier with generated code. I suppose some abstract engine could be devised, but I wouldn't go so far as to recommend it.
Need some code to play with.... Any ETA on CVS? --Kurt -----Original Message----- From: Aaron Mulder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Central piece: to JMX or not to JMX - Avalon On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Guenther, Kurt - NASHCCON wrote: > I've seen the reflection approach work out very well to the point where > generated code was no longer necessary to support EJB's. When you see Sun's > CTS, you'll see where this would be valuable and it also lends itself to a > fluid development environment. Some level of generated code (or generated bytecode) is always going to be necessary for CMP, though, since CMP EJB classes are abstract. Right? Aaron > I'm somewhat inclined to think reflection as a modus operandi for Geronimo's > backplane would be a good thing.
