1) None of the servers we were willing to certify for production met its requirements for up-to-dateness of packages (it takes a lot of brand new, with particular patches, packages).
2) Database corrupts far too often. It is an "easy to fix" corruption, and they include the tool to do it, but... no thank you.
Other than that it worked nicely.
-Brian
On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 01:45 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Jeremy Boynes said:
JB>Noel J. Bergman wrote:
JB>> Want to try using SVN? Is it ready?
JB>>
JB>
JB>Would love to if it isn't too hard to get people up and running. My biggest
JB>concern would be client support (availability of IDE integration etc), but
JB>maybe the server-side benefits (like move :-) outweigh that.
JB>
JB>Do we have any SVN experts around?
JB>
JB>Is there a sandbox?
I agree. I've been thinking about installing it on one of my servers at home
to play with it. I'd love to be able to use it.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","<0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F9E<G)E=\$\!F<FEI+F-O;0\`\`");'
The Castor Project http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo.html
