On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 01:55 PM, Bill de h�ra wrote:
Seeing as RMH kicked off some honest speaking earlier, here's my 2c on all this malarky.
I'm not seeing peer review on this thread. not by a long shot. I think Alex is catching some negative feedback that doesn't strike me as clear, useful, or informative. I certainly wouldn't be sure what to do to get better after sucking it up. People here, especially those with commit and membership liberties can perhaps do better than non-respond to (it seems to me) a fair question by citing the poster as melodramatic, or claim patches are being dumped on them again.
I suggest you go back and read the Alex threads. The reason no one wants to respond is they don't want to get into this exact kind of pissing match. It is an extreme waste of time and almost none of the threads come to a conclusion, and most end in a rant about how the big bad committers are crushing his enthusiasm. Alex has already burned out David Blevins and my self, and it looks like Jeremy is close to giving up on working with him. After that I don't know who would be willing to work with him, and since he has burned a lot of bridges already I don't see him getting commit access anytime soon.
-dain
/************************* * Dain Sundstrom * Partner * Core Developers Network *************************/
