I'm guessing because right now we need basic features like operation
invocation. Once we get some basic features we can look at
re-architecting the system, but now it is early. Anyway, to me most of
the suggestions look like differences in web design philosophy.
-dain
On Monday, November 3, 2003, at 06:13 AM, James Strachan wrote:
FWIW Ryan's points all seem pretty valid to me; I don't see why you're
recommending he goes off to SF or that his ideas are over-engineered.
On Saturday, November 1, 2003, at 06:22 am, n. alex rupp wrote:
Ryan,
Let's please keep discussions about this on the list : )
I think your ideas below are overengineered, but you sound like
you've given
it a lot of thought and perhaps the ideas have merit, but they'll
best be
judged when they're backed up with some code. You might start a
project at
sf.net and build this sucker from the ground up (doesn't seem that
you'll
need to reuse any of the pieces we've got), and when you get it
working, we
can take a look at it and either use it to replace what we've got, or
merge
the two together, using the best parts of each. Get the web
application
working, and we'll go from there.
I'm working on adding simple functionality like method invocation.
Perhaps
we can join our stuff together somewhere down the line. You might
also look
into other projects which are building generic libraries for working
with
JMX. I think Simone Bordet knows of a good one (but I can't remember
it for
the life of me)
Good luck and welcome : )
--
N. Alex Rupp
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Sonnek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: console-web
ok, here are my ideas. please let me know if they go against any
design
you
had in mind.
1. remove html from JSP custom tags.
2. use JSTL in jsp tags to output lists of JMX services
4. use xdoclet to generate web.xml and taglib.tld.
3. refactor majority of code into reusable JMX client for use with
other
"consoles". i think this might work best to add a new module, so
that the
console-web module has a dependency on the new module. this would
allow
for
the taglib.tld to be picked up automatically without having to
specify it
in
the web.xml
i think that was pretty much it. i have not done any development for
geronimo, but have gone through the wiki extensively. what would be
the
best way to go about this? do the development, create a patch, and
submit
it to JIRA?
if i have questions, should i email you directly, or would the dev
list or
wiki be a better communication spot? Oh, and i wanted to let you
know
that
it's great to see other minnesota based J2EE developers! i'm from
mankato
myself, and down here, J2EE is still in it's infancy.
Ryan Sonnek
------------
"God is the Lord of angels, of men - and of elves."
- J.R.R. Tolkien
From: "n. alex rupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ryan sonnek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: console-web
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:42:10 -0600
Ryan,
Go ahead and post your ideas : )
--
N. Alex Rupp
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
/*************************
* Dain Sundstrom
* Partner
* Core Developers Network
*************************/
