On Nov 11, 2003, at 2:36 PM, n. alex rupp wrote:
Some of their examples (like Alan C's post describing how he took code from Elba
for use in his JAAS implementation) should raise some eyebrows. But the real
question remains--is this what he ended up doing, and who owned the copyright
authority for the files he claims to have taken from Elba? Was it one of the
commiters here? If so, there's no foul play afoot because it's their property
and they've made their wishes with regards to that property well known. If it
wasn't their property, if they developed a derivative of someone else's property
under terms of a license, then they must continue to abide by the terms of that
license.
There is the growing thought that the existence of Elba, especially how it is self-described (yes, that description is out-of-date, but nonetheless), is more harmful to Geronimo than helpful
